The point of this blog is to capture my own class notes during my tenure as a law student. Everything on here is my own work and reflects the knowledge and understanding of the law I possessed at the time. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 License. Please do not rely on this blog for legal advice. Consult an attorney for proper legal counseling.
May 8, 2008
Copyright: fair-use factors
Elements that can be looked at to find "fair use" in copyright:
Or, is it satire? (Satire makes fun of society as a whole, and shouldn't need to reference a single, specific work.)
- Purpose and character of the use
- Nature of the workk
- Amount used--substantial amount or not?
- Effect on the market or value of the original work
Or, is it satire? (Satire makes fun of society as a whole, and shouldn't need to reference a single, specific work.)
Copyright: work for hire
Elements that can be used to determine of an item is a "work for hire," meaning the copyright belongs to the employer instead of the creator:
- Right to control
- Who exercised actual control
- Back to a common-law definition of employee
- Salaried (a formalistic definition of employee)
Copyright: idea/expression dichotomy and tests
Only expression is copyrightable, not ideas (or facts, or history... the more historical/factual, the "thinner" the copyright until is disappears entirely).
Three possible tests courts have used to separate these:
Three possible tests courts have used to separate these:
- Levels of abstraction
- Pattern
- Total look & feel
Copyright: infringement elements
Demonstrating copyright infringement requires that one show all three of the following:
A valid copyright is (all three required):
- Ownership of a valid copyright
- Copying
- Of constituent elements that are protected
A valid copyright is (all three required):
- An original work
- Fixed
- In a tangible means of expression
- A modicum of creativity
- Independent creation
Trademark: fair-use factors
Three factors may lead to a finding of "fair use" when one uses a trademark without permission (all are required to find fair use):
- There is no way to readily identify a kind of product without using the trademarked name AND
- Only as much of the mark is used as is reasonably necessary AND
- There is no suggestion of sponsorship or endorsement by the trademark owner.
Trademark
Goals of trademark law:
Four types of trademarks:
- Prevent misappropriation of goodwill
- Prevent consumer deception or fraud
Four types of trademarks:
- Fanciful: made-up (like "Kodak")
- Arbitrary: the meaning is not related to the product
- Suggestive: name suggests but does not describe ("Tide," "Roach Motel")
- Descriptive: can only be trademarked if the mark acquires "secondary meaning"
- generally requires showing 5 years of uninterrupted use
Patents: non-obviousness
From § 103 of the Patent Act:
Two tests: (1) test is T-S-M (teaching-suggestion-motivation)
Two tests: (1) test is T-S-M (teaching-suggestion-motivation)
- meaning are there teachings, suggestions, or other kinds of motivations in the prior art or previous patents that make the "new" invention obvious?
- Scope and content of prior art
- Different between prior art and current claims
- Level of skill in art (is the inventor a PHOSITA [person having ordinary skill in the art] or not?)
- Secondary considerations:
- long felt but unsolved need
- commercial success
- failure of others
- other copying (NEWER)
- long felt but unsolved need
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

