Duress and Necessity

DURESS
  • Exclusions:
    • Under common law, intentional murder excluded from duress (but maybe not felony murder).
    • Voluntary exposure to situation also not duress.
  • Duress must be imminent.

NECESSITY
The Queen v. Dudley & Stephens

  • Killed and ate the cabin boy(!) to stay alive.
  • Mostly cannot excuse killing by necessity.
  • But MPC says can be, depending on weighing the circumstances.
    • 5 lives might be better to save than 1.
    • But no real cases that sustain that, just some dicta.
United States v. Kabat
  • Broke into missile silos
  • Not an imminent threat, plus some political choice likely being made.
  • But might well apply if you new something was going wrong, and stopped it in time.
  • But attacking military/political offices as a protest, usually the courts do not find necessity.
Basically: can commit one crime to prevent another crime, must be reasonably perceived to be that way (Reasonable Mistake OK). Political choices iffy. Closely causal and imminent threat.
View most interesting 'lawschool' photos on Flickriver

Related Notes

Related Commentary